authentiikate

Dear liverjournalness,
This is Charlie, K's alter egos other body. I just have to angsty vent about how I have terrible separation anxiety from my K self.
Amen and God bless. <><>

Posted via LiveJournal.app.

You spill it all.
I prefer not to call it writer's "block".
Nothing is blocked.
I am only uninspired, by myself.
An illegitimate writer will complain about lack of stories.
A good writer finds intriguing stories everyday all around them.
I read up on this man, David Icke. He has this (conspiracy) theory about this pure reptilian bloodline. How all the leaders in the world are intrabred into this reptilian bloodline. Along with their incestuous ancestry comes shape shifting, which he leaves plenty of links to youtube videos where newscasters eyes shift, change color, and the texture of their skin morph on live TV. For some reason I want to believe it, but my skeptical predisposition would never allow it.

I went to church last Sunday, purely for educational purposes. Let's not be ignorant, to have a legitimate opinion on something, you have to know what you're talking about, empirical evidence helps. There is one major difference between myself and religious enthusiasts; it is logic. Not to say religious folk don't use logic, I cannot claim that, but they (they) use a different type of logic than myself. There are two types of logic: Inductive logic and deductive logic.
Inductive reasoning involves assessing a specific set of facts and coming to a general conclusion henceforth. This is the logic in which I live my life. I observe, I make an opinion in which I resolve as fact, for me. Without said evidence there is nothing to base an opinion (or fact) on. This is also the logic of the scientific method: the facts speak, and a conclusion is draw from those facts.
Simple example:  5 + 1 = 6     Six is an even number. So, the sum of two odd numbers will result in an even number. 

Deductive reasoning works with premises that support a claim already made. Essentially, believe a claim and apprehend facts that support your original claim. This must be the logic that religious folk rely on. This method does not distinguish bias because the way deductive logic is structured only calls for traits that support the claim that you already believe in, everything else is thrown by the wayside.
Example:  Men are mortal.
Plato was a man.
Plato was mortal.
(ironic when the dynamic of God - an immortal)

I'm done with that.

Lets talk about 2012. Before I jump in, did you know that every 13 years the calendar repeats itself? So its 2010 right now, that means the calendars used in 1997 are identical to this years'. I've researched the whole doomsday idea, and although I like the idea of it (why not?) it is steamy pile of shit. December 12, 2012 marks the end of a 5,126 year era. It is a Long Count calendar that ended after Spanish colonization and resets at zero after 5,000 some-even years. It marks the end of their un-colonized cultural cycle, and is a fabricated chance for people to cash in. Some scholars say Mayan's knew that 2012 would mark the solstice sun residence in the center of the Milky Way hibbity who-ha. Whatever. This is real great shit, We all want to believe it. It just reminds me of April 26th 1992, "there was a riot in the streets, tell me where were you?" Sublime.  Oh the anticipation! Looking forward to the chaos. What primal idiots we are. Enjoy it. Here's a cartoon:
 

 

More later, I'm meeting Am.